[hunchentoot-devel] Request methods suffixed with * -- not backwards compatible?

[Chaitanya Gupta]

Hans Hübner wrote:
> We found that it was very inconvenient that there are no accessor
> functions for the slots in the request object, and that the accessors
> should be conventionally named.  I think we are not completely done
> with the API cleanup, though, and it may well be that there will be
> further changes before the next real release (i.e. the reply class may
> be changed, too).  It is propably safe to assume that the *-versions
> of the accessors will stay forever.
>
>   

Ok. But does it mean that code written for the current release version 
of hunchentoot will break? As of now, I can't really use our existing 
code with the dev version, which is quite a dampener..

Chaitanya