[clfswm-devel] User API proposition

[Xavier Maillard]

   > It is meant to be a discussion on the CLFSWM  features at a user stand
   > point, so feel free to correct, comment and etc.

   Cool, I've commented it. In particular I don't see the need for the
   frame layer.

I read the explanations and as far as I understand, the problem
is more about the terminology than anything else. Frame == Window
is the current CLFSWM implementation.

That makes me think we should probably add a glossary page somewhere.

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org