[hunchentoot-devel] Small patch for LispWorks 6 beta

Edi Weitz edi at agharta.de
Wed Oct 14 21:37:58 UTC 2009


Thanks, applied to the dev version.

Edi.

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Nico de Jager <ndj at bitart.cc> wrote:
> Edi Weitz <edi at agharta.de> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Nico de Jager <ndj at bitart.cc> wrote:
>>
>>> No, it is as intended. Please correct me if I am having a brain fart.
>>
>> My bad.  I didn't look closely enough.
>>
>>> The first patch I sent to Edi privately, was as the one at the
>>> bottom. But isn't
>>>
>>> #+:lispworks4  ==  #-(or :lispworks5 :lispworks6)
>>> and
>>> #-:lispworks4  ==  #+(or :lispworks5 :lispworks6)
>>>
>>> when we are only considering version 4, 5 and 6? In fact, the patch at
>>> the top is better, since when LispWorks 7.x comes out the patch above
>>> will already work as it covers versions 4 and higher, but the patch
>>> below will have to be amended, since it only covers version 4, 5 and
>>> 6. Which one is clearer, is subjective - I like the one at the top
>>> because the exceptions is specifically for LispWorks4 and for the reason
>>> described in the previous sentence.
>>
>> What I don't like about this is that it doesn't take LW3 into account... :)
>>
>> Only half joking, really.  Starting with LW4 seems a rather arbitrary
>> assumption to me although the code very likely won't work with LW3
>> anyway, but the code isn't self-documenting anymore.  #-:lispworks4
>> says "for all except LW4" while you actually wanted to say "for LW5
>> and LW6 and maybe LW7 as well".
>
> But..., hmm..., ok. :-)
>
>
>>> B.t.w. the double #+:lispworks5 #+:lispworks5 in the original code is a
>>> (harmless) mistake, correct?
>>
>> No, it's on purpose.  It affects the /two/ forms following it and your
>> patch must also take care of two forms.
>
> I see - thanks Edi. Back to the CLHS then...
>
> Below, is another attempt.
>
> Regards.
> Nico
>
>
> $ diff -u lispworks.lisp lispworks.lisp_patched3
> --- lispworks.lisp      2009-02-17 00:14:24.000000000 +0200
> +++ lispworks.lisp_patched3     2009-10-02 20:03:58.986727798 +0200
> @@ -90,14 +90,14 @@
>  (defun make-socket-stream (socket acceptor)
>   "Returns a stream for the socket SOCKET.  The ACCEPTOR argument is
>  used to set the timeouts."
> -  #-:lispworks5
> +  #-(or :lispworks5 :lispworks6)
>   (when (acceptor-write-timeout acceptor)
>     (parameter-error "You need LispWorks 5 or higher for write timeouts."))
>   (make-instance 'comm:socket-stream
>                  :socket socket
>                  :direction :io
>                  :read-timeout (acceptor-read-timeout acceptor)
> -                 #+:lispworks5 #+:lispworks5
> +                 #+(or :lispworks5 :lispworks6) #+(or :lispworks5 :lispworks6)
>                  :write-timeout (acceptor-write-timeout acceptor)
>                  :element-type 'octet))
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel




More information about the Tbnl-devel mailing list