[cl-typesetting-devel] HTML rendering

Dmitri Ivanov divanov at aha.ru
Mon Apr 19 15:21:40 UTC 2004


Hello Klaus,

| That's one example where the FO classification is IMHO useful -
| remember that many fonts have more weights than just :bold and :normal.
|
| It defines the following attributes, cf.
|    http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#font-selection-strategy
|
|   7.8.9 "font-weight"
|
|   CSS2 Definition:
|   Value:  normal | bold | bolder | lighter | 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 |
| 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 | 900 | inherit
|
|   7.8.7 "font-style"
|
|   CSS2 Definition:
|   Value:  normal | italic | oblique | backslant | inherit
|...snip...|

What is the point to name this CSS2-originated staff by "FO classification"
? (BTW I have not said I disregard CSS :-))
--
Sincerely,
Dmitri Ivanov
www.ystok.ru





More information about the cl-typesetting-devel mailing list