[cells-devel] [Fwd: Re: Cells 2.0 released]

[Kenny Tilton]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Cells 2.0 released
Date: 04 May 2005 13:21:49 -0700
From: Fred Gilham <gilham at snapdragon.csl.sri.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
References: <xcvis20842e.fsf at conquest.OCF.Berkeley.EDU>


> Partial support exists for CMUCL, Corman Lisp, and MCL.

The docs say that one of the tests fails with CMU Lisp.  However, I
don't see any sign of that when I run with a recent snapshot (March
2005).  What does this failure look like?

I ran the same process in sbcl as common lisp, then compared the
output. That is, I ran (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :cells-test) in both.
Then I compared the outputs.  Except for formatting and a few other
minor issues, they were the same.

Does this imply that CMUCL is runing cells 2.0 correctly?

-- 
Fred Gilham                                       gilham at csl.sri.com
	  Comprehensive Computer Language Preference Survey
Do you like Lisp?  (Check one)
      [ ] Yes     [ ] Sure     [ ] You bet     [ ] Yep     [ ] Da

-- 
Cells? Cello? Cells-Gtk?: http://www.common-lisp.net/project/cells/
Why Lisp? http://lisp.tech.coop/RtL%20Highlight%20Film

"Doctor, I wrestled with reality for forty years, and I am happy to 
state that I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd