From fahree at gmail.com Wed Jul 7 20:51:59 2010 From: fahree at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Far=E9?=) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:51:59 -0400 Subject: [hunchentoot-devel] 'max-threads' behavior for Hunchentoot In-Reply-To: References: <96F4A9B1-5603-4DE1-9144-415C9251DAA5@itasoftware.com> <4C05217C.4040406@itasoftware.com> <16493326-0713-4954-8976-19ED0C10D74C@itasoftware.com> <836C1566-0760-4000-AAA9-440FBAAB51EA@itasoftware.com> <586901B0-D79A-4AE5-908F-4FFEE9E3AF38@itasoftware.com> <18913F0E-C4B7-4044-8D02-45BCBBA0CDDE@itasoftware.com> Message-ID: Dear Hunchentoot maintainers, I've merged Scott's changes with the latest upstream hunchentoot from darcs (version 1.1.0 from 2010-01-09) and my XCVB changes. Here it is attached. Can you either apply or tell me how I may change the thing to fit your standards? [ Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem more afraid of life than death. ? James F. Byrnes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: hunchentoot.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 48443 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hans.huebner at gmail.com Wed Jul 7 21:32:35 2010 From: hans.huebner at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans_H=FCbner?=) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 23:32:35 +0200 Subject: [hunchentoot-devel] 'max-threads' behavior for Hunchentoot In-Reply-To: References: <96F4A9B1-5603-4DE1-9144-415C9251DAA5@itasoftware.com> <4C05217C.4040406@itasoftware.com> <16493326-0713-4954-8976-19ED0C10D74C@itasoftware.com> <836C1566-0760-4000-AAA9-440FBAAB51EA@itasoftware.com> <586901B0-D79A-4AE5-908F-4FFEE9E3AF38@itasoftware.com> <18913F0E-C4B7-4044-8D02-45BCBBA0CDDE@itasoftware.com> Message-ID: Hi Far?, thank you for consolidating the patch. Please resubmit without the xcvb changes (we discussed this before) and make sure that you are submitting a patch against the subversion repository, as we do not use the darcs repository and do not know whether it is up to date or diverged. As a general note: It is much easier to review patches if they do not contain arbitary whitespace changes. Thanks, Hans On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 22:51, Far? wrote: > Dear Hunchentoot maintainers, > > I've merged Scott's changes with the latest upstream hunchentoot from > darcs (version 1.1.0 from 2010-01-09) and my XCVB changes. > > Here it is attached. > > Can you either apply or tell me how I may change the thing to fit your > standards? > > [ Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] > Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. ?They seem > more afraid of life than death. > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? James F. Byrnes > > _______________________________________________ > tbnl-devel site list > tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel > From edi at agharta.de Wed Jul 7 21:38:22 2010 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 23:38:22 +0200 Subject: [hunchentoot-devel] 'max-threads' behavior for Hunchentoot In-Reply-To: References: <96F4A9B1-5603-4DE1-9144-415C9251DAA5@itasoftware.com> <4C05217C.4040406@itasoftware.com> <16493326-0713-4954-8976-19ED0C10D74C@itasoftware.com> <836C1566-0760-4000-AAA9-440FBAAB51EA@itasoftware.com> <586901B0-D79A-4AE5-908F-4FFEE9E3AF38@itasoftware.com> <18913F0E-C4B7-4044-8D02-45BCBBA0CDDE@itasoftware.com> Message-ID: Hi Far?, The patch standards you asked for are here: http://weitz.de/patches.html And the Subversion repository Hans mentioned is here: http://bknr.net/trac/browser/trunk/thirdparty/hunchentoot Thanks, Edi. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Hans H?bner wrote: > Hi Far?, > > thank you for consolidating the patch. ?Please resubmit without the > xcvb changes (we discussed this before) and make sure that you are > submitting a patch against the subversion repository, as we do not use > the darcs repository and do not know whether it is up to date or > diverged. > > As a general note: ?It is much easier to review patches if they do not > contain arbitary whitespace changes. > > Thanks, > Hans > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 22:51, Far? wrote: >> Dear Hunchentoot maintainers, >> >> I've merged Scott's changes with the latest upstream hunchentoot from >> darcs (version 1.1.0 from 2010-01-09) and my XCVB changes. >> >> Here it is attached. >> >> Can you either apply or tell me how I may change the thing to fit your >> standards? >> >> [ Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] >> Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. ?They seem >> more afraid of life than death. >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? James F. Byrnes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tbnl-devel site list >> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > tbnl-devel site list > tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel > >