[hunchentoot-devel] Re: GET-BACKTRACE

[Ury Marshak]

� wrote:

>   The GET-BACKTRACE function still remains as being
>   non-portable.
>
>   
Is there a possibility of splitting it off to a separate library too? 
It'll be just the thin
portability layer, of course, but I can see some other possible uses for 
a hypothetical,
well, say, chardonnay-backtraces library. For example some (non-web) 
delivered
applications that could write backtraces to a log file to be examined by 
the author later,
or to be emailed to the author.

Cheers,
Ury