From edi at agharta.de Sun Nov 5 20:32:04 2006 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:32:04 +0100 Subject: [hunchentoot-announce] New version 0.4.6 (Was: Confusing Hunchentoot behaviour) In-Reply-To: (Marijn Haverbeke's message of "Sat, 4 Nov 2006 21:48:24 +0100") References: Message-ID: On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 21:48:24 +0100, "Marijn Haverbeke" wrote: > A good fix would be to just call *meta-dispatcher* for every call to > dispatch-request, so that you've always got the most recent > dispatch-table and the programmer can fiddle with that variable from > the REPL and immediately see the result. I've implemented that now in the new version. *META-DISPATCHER* came in pretty late in the game, and it wasn't intended to behave like it did until 0.4.5. Thanks for the report. Cheers, Edi. From edi at agharta.de Sun Nov 5 22:57:39 2006 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:57:39 +0100 Subject: [hunchentoot-announce] New version 0.4.7 (Was: real-remote-addr and proxy chains) In-Reply-To: <20061105211850.GB14326@oja.no> (Robert J. Macomber's message of "Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:18:50 -0700") References: <20061102181555.GA12734@oja.no> <20061105204818.GA14326@oja.no> <20061105211850.GB14326@oja.no> Message-ID: On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:18:50 -0700, "Robert J. Macomber" wrote: > Depends on whether you're interested in the user's (claimed) real > address, or the address the user presents to the web server to which > he thinks he's speaking. In my case, I'm interested in the latter > (that is, I'm just interested in what REMOTE-ADDR would be if > Hunchentoot weren't behind a server-side proxy). Having looked at > the documentation for sessions in the past five minutes, I see that > that machinery is interested in the former. OK, I've implemented the version I described in my previous email. The new release also fixes the bug in COOKIE-OUT you mentioned. Thanks, Edi. From edi at agharta.de Mon Nov 6 00:06:36 2006 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:06:36 +0100 Subject: [hunchentoot-announce] New version 0.4.8 (Was: Problems with file uploads and mod_lisp) In-Reply-To: (Edi Weitz's message of "Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:07:26 +0100") References: Message-ID: On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:07:26 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: > I just realized that Hunchentoot in its current form has problems > with file uploads if it's used behind mod_lisp. I think I've fixed this in 0.4.8 now. At least I found something in START-OUTPUT which was obviously wrong and a result of my porting and re-factoring Hunchentoot/TBNL too hastily. Cheers, Edi. From edi at agharta.de Sun Nov 12 13:44:13 2006 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:44:13 +0100 Subject: [hunchentoot-announce] New release 0.4.9 (Was: header(s)-out) In-Reply-To: <20061109215558.GC7054@oja.no> (Robert J. Macomber's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:55:58 -0700") References: <20061109215558.GC7054@oja.no> Message-ID: On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:55:58 -0700, "Robert J. Macomber" wrote: > There seems to be some small bugs involving header-out. The > accessor is documented to take both keywords and strings, but > neither works reliably because: > > [snip] Yes, you're absolutely right. Thanks for spotting that. As I said, there were obviously too many (untested) changes at once when I switched from TBNL to Hunchentoot. > Here's a patch which normalizes things so the keys of this alist are > always strings and the lookup is always done with strings. I've changed this a little bit because I prefer that the keys are strings. Thanks, Edi. From edi at agharta.de Sun Nov 19 20:54:10 2006 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:54:10 +0100 Subject: [hunchentoot-announce] New release 0.4.10 (Was: *http-error-handler* behaviour) In-Reply-To: (Marijn Haverbeke's message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:55 +0100") References: Message-ID: On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:55 +0100, "Marijn Haverbeke" wrote: > Attached is the patch, I went with the name *handle-http-errors-p* > instead. Thanks a lot - it's in the latest release. Cheers, Edi.