From attila.lendvai at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 13:34:53 2010 From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:34:53 +0100 Subject: [stefil-devel] Stefil documentation In-Reply-To: <391934951002220523h4522d690sec0c7d928e529871@mail.gmail.com> References: <391934951002220523h4522d690sec0c7d928e529871@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: > Are there more comprehensive documentation for Stefil other than the > one at http://common-lisp.net/project/stefil/demo.html? The README > currently points to http://dwim.hu/project/hu.dwim.stefil which > doesn't help a lot either. > > Do you have pointers that you can point me to? too many things to do and no time for documentation, sorry. the canonical point will be http://dwim.hu/project/hu.dwim.stefil which is the content available in the hu.dwim.stefil repo in documentation/stefil.lisp you can also find the log of a lightning talk in documentation/lightning-talk.lisp. there's really not much more to stefil docs than that... hth, -- attila From attila.lendvai at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 19:10:46 2010 From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:10:46 +0100 Subject: [stefil-devel] trouble with darcs repos In-Reply-To: <1d765e1518503c6797d49306ca6f461c.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> References: <1d765e1518503c6797d49306ca6f461c.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> Message-ID: hi Daniel, > Sorry for the slow reply. ?Thank you for explaining the situation. ?Since > hu.dwim.stefil is a fork of Stefil, could you remove the darcs "redirect" not really a fork in the sense that i don't know about anyone doing/planning any changes against the old repo. or at least we certainly abandoned it... > notice and simply put a note on the Stefil website? i'm not sure i want to do that, because hu.dwim.stefil is a new and better revision of stefil and i want newcomers to use the new version and report bugs/send patches against that. if someone is already using stefil then they can decide if it's worth the trouble to upgrade after seeing that heads up message... btw, that notice is a hard-link between all our 10+ obsolete repos. if you don't want to bother, then please just ignore the notice and keep on using the old repo. -- attila