From marijnh at gmail.com  Wed Sep  2 09:22:05 2015
From: marijnh at gmail.com (Marijn Haverbeke)
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:22:05 +0200
Subject: Supporting ~/.pgpass?
In-Reply-To: <CAA_SOw_sMRW9Nj=HjEGhbDbLngec+H=WX=5U0BrasYF=UmkTCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA_SOw8frh0s2PyoWd4OVxPEwWe+g_S=Cj5TGis6kepv9kMBHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJnHWXsKkYF0u=-wWxuCH50Mdnw+Y83RMi41Run3uyZ3oC_qEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA_SOw_sMRW9Nj=HjEGhbDbLngec+H=WX=5U0BrasYF=UmkTCg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJnHWXsOGEsf66GKdehnF29BuL8EyDbDJ05YnYyuA+8nKkGC6w@mail.gmail.com>

I suppose you'll have to write a wrapper, yes.

On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson
<johann at myrkraverk.com> wrote:
> Hi Marjin,
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Marijn Haverbeke <marijnh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Johann,
>>
>> Postmodern's scope is definitely not going to grow anymore. You'll
>> have to either keep using your snippet as it is, or package it up as a
>> module that people can install alongside Postmodern.
>
> Can such a module hook into postmodern to make the password parameter
> unnecessary in calls to connect or with-connection?  Or "take over"
> when it's passed in as nil?
>
> Or will I have to make my own wrappers?
>
> --
> Johann
>
>  I'm not from the internet, I just work there.