From john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 21:19:13 2012 From: john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com (John Morrison) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:19:13 -0400 Subject: [mcclim-devel] Official repository lagging? In-Reply-To: <87mx1ky2sw.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <87hars3d4f.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <50373DF8.2050809@bricoworks.com> <37CD1795-0330-4219-9BCC-7F168791780F@constantly.at> <87mx1ky2sw.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Message-ID: Hi; I also would like to see a single official repository, whether git/github or otherwise, with continued incorporation of patches/improvements. (Some time ago I submitted patches for the scigraph portion of mcclim which I would have liked to seen included.) Has there been any movement on this, especially as regards quicklisp? If there is anything I can do to help, I would certainly be happy to do so. Please advise. Thanks! -jm On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Manuel Giraud wrote: > Rudolf Schlatte writes: > > > On Aug 24, 2012, at 10:40, Timothy Moore wrote: > > > >> I was going to save this mail until my current round of mcclim hacking > is finished, but here > >> goes. I'm not particularly interested in continuing to work with CVS. > Are people agreeable > >> with moving to git? I'm not invested (at all) in having my github repo > become the "official" > >> repo, but a site like github has a lot of advantages as a host. > > > > I'm very much in favor of moving to git. git-svn works well enough > > for upstream svn archives, but syncing back and forth with cvs is > > always uncomfortable for me. > > > > But could we leave the "official" git archive on common-lisp.net? I > > like github, but when I'm checking out a project that I'm unfamiliar > > with, I hate having to decide between downloading (for the sake of > > example) onixie/mcclim, slyrus/mcclim, mmontone/mcclim and > > timoore/mcclim. > > Same here. I'm too in favor to switch to git (which is clearly easier > than CVS) but keeping the official mcclim repository where the project > is seems better to me. github is cool, fun, social and whatnot but I > find it hard to get an official software out of it. > > -- > Manuel Giraud > > _______________________________________________ > mcclim-devel mailing list > mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 23:20:31 2012 From: john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com (John Morrison) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:20:31 -0400 Subject: [mcclim-devel] prompt-for-items-from-list with list-pane In-Reply-To: <877grl3zm7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877grl3zm7.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: My CLIM Kung Fu is not so great, but it seems a slot on the application frame might be more to your liking? I would be interested if there is some better, more canonical approach... -jm On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Kilian Sprotte wrote: > Hi, > > I made a simple implementation of prompt-for-items-from-list. Any > comments? In particular, I am wondering if :items *items* using a > special variable is the only way to initialize the list-pane. > > Regards, > Kilian > > (defvar *items*) > > (define-application-frame items-from-list () > ((exit-command :accessor exit-command)) > (:menu-bar t) > (:panes > (list (make-pane 'list-pane > :mode :nonexclusive > :items *items*))) > (:layouts > (default > (scrolling (:scroll-bar :vertical) > list)))) > > (macrolet ((frob (command) > `(define-items-from-list-command (,command :name t :menu t) () > (setf (exit-command *application-frame*) ',command) > (frame-exit *application-frame*)))) > (frob com-ok) > (frob com-cancel)) > > (defun prompt-for-items-from-list (items) > (flet ((get-list-pane (frame) > (find-pane-named frame 'list))) > (let* ((*items* items) > (frame (make-application-frame 'items-from-list))) > (run-frame-top-level frame) > (ecase (exit-command frame) > (com-ok > (values (gadget-value (get-list-pane frame)) > t)) > (com-cancel > (values nil > nil)))))) > > > _______________________________________________ > mcclim-devel mailing list > mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: prompt2.lisp Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1217 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mikemac at mikemac.com Wed Oct 31 23:11:26 2012 From: mikemac at mikemac.com (Michael McDonald) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:11:26 -0700 Subject: [mcclim-devel] Official repository lagging? In-Reply-To: References: <87hars3d4f.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <50373DF8.2050809@bricoworks.com> <37CD1795-0330-4219-9BCC-7F168791780F@constantly.at> <87mx1ky2sw.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Message-ID: Personally, I hate 'git'. My old brain has a far easier time making the correct mental model for CVS or SVN than 'git'. But that's me. If you do decide to move to 'git', or anything else for that matter, then I STRONGLY suggest you do it in a fashion whereby you do NOT lose the history of the files. There's a lot of valuable info in the commit messages and the version trees. Just taking the top of trunk from CVS and making a 'git' repo from it is not acceptable in my opinion. Michael McDonald mikemac at mikemac.com On Oct 31, 2012, at 2:19 PM, John Morrison wrote: > Hi; > > I also would like to see a single official repository, whether git/github or otherwise, with continued incorporation of patches/improvements. (Some time ago I submitted patches for the scigraph portion of mcclim which I would have liked to seen included.) Has there been any movement on this, especially as regards quicklisp? > > If there is anything I can do to help, I would certainly be happy to do so. Please advise. > > Thanks! > > -jm > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Manuel Giraud wrote: > Rudolf Schlatte writes: > > > On Aug 24, 2012, at 10:40, Timothy Moore wrote: > > > >> I was going to save this mail until my current round of mcclim hacking is finished, but here > >> goes. I'm not particularly interested in continuing to work with CVS. Are people agreeable > >> with moving to git? I'm not invested (at all) in having my github repo become the "official" > >> repo, but a site like github has a lot of advantages as a host. > > > > I'm very much in favor of moving to git. git-svn works well enough > > for upstream svn archives, but syncing back and forth with cvs is > > always uncomfortable for me. > > > > But could we leave the "official" git archive on common-lisp.net? I > > like github, but when I'm checking out a project that I'm unfamiliar > > with, I hate having to decide between downloading (for the sake of > > example) onixie/mcclim, slyrus/mcclim, mmontone/mcclim and > > timoore/mcclim. > > Same here. I'm too in favor to switch to git (which is clearly easier > than CVS) but keeping the official mcclim repository where the project > is seems better to me. github is cool, fun, social and whatnot but I > find it hard to get an official software out of it. > > -- > Manuel Giraud > > _______________________________________________ > mcclim-devel mailing list > mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel > > _______________________________________________ > mcclim-devel mailing list > mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: