From attila.lendvai at gmail.com Fri Nov 13 17:16:24 2009 From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:16:24 +0100 Subject: [fetter-devel] Is fetter under active development? In-Reply-To: <200911131031.17364.john.nmi.morrison@gmail.com> References: <200911131031.17364.john.nmi.morrison@gmail.com> Message-ID: hello > I just updated my (ancient) darcs repo of fetter, and the most recent > change I saw (I am new to darcs) was over a year ago... yes, there was no development in verrazano for a year now. check out the TODO file. the first thing i would do is to change the output generation to generate cffi-grovel files. it's somewhere on my todo, but not in the next months, unless we again need to deal with ffi due to a client... -- attila From john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com Fri Nov 13 17:38:30 2009 From: john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com (John Morrison) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:38:30 -0500 Subject: [fetter-devel] Is fetter under active development? In-Reply-To: References: <200911131031.17364.john.nmi.morrison@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200911131238.30400.john.nmi.morrison@gmail.com> Hello Attila; Thanks for getting back to me. On Friday 13 November 2009 12:16, Attila Lendvai wrote: > hello > > > I just updated my (ancient) darcs repo of fetter, and the most recent > > change I saw (I am new to darcs) was over a year ago... > > yes, there was no development in verrazano for a year now. > > check out the TODO file. the first thing i would do is to change the > output generation to generate cffi-grovel files. > > it's somewhere on my todo, but not in the next months, unless we again > need to deal with ffi due to a client... Thanks also for the information. I really appreciate it. -jm -- --- John Morrison --- john.nmi.morrison at gmail.com