From reddaly at gmail.com  Sun Jun 12 05:04:40 2011
From: reddaly at gmail.com (Red Daly)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:04:40 +0700
Subject: [elephant-devel] Fwd: Elephant patch for current SBCL
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimB9Tkq-tNahndR+C45e7PhmHn8CfDD3mBQAu=G@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>

This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections to
the patch?

The patch seems to fix metaobject protocol issues.  Does anybody object to
moving Elephant over to use Closer to MOP?  We could avoid this sort of bug
in the future

Red

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nikodemus Siivola <
nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:

> *cough* attached...
>
> Cheers,
>
>  -- Nikodemus
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus at random-state.net>
> Date: 29 March 2011 08:33
> Subject: Elephant patch for current SBCL
> To: quicklisp at googlegroups.com, elephant-devel at common-lisp.net,
> ablumberg at common-lisp.net, rread at common-lisp.net,
> ieslick at common-lisp.net
>
>
> Attached a darcs diff against the 1.0 repository, which restores
> buildability on recent SBCLs.
>
> As of 1.0.46.11, various internals changed broke Elephant. I haven't
> tested the attached patch very carefully, but it builds and passes
> Elephant's own tests.
>
> As near as I can tell the code I excised should never (well, for the
> past few years at any rate) have been needed on SBCL.
>
> Cheers,
>
>  -- Nikodemus
>
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/elephant-devel/attachments/20110612/6c812d2c/attachment.html>

From alex.mizrahi at gmail.com  Sat Jun 18 13:35:08 2011
From: alex.mizrahi at gmail.com (Alex Mizrahi)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:35:08 +0300
Subject: [elephant-devel] Fwd: Elephant patch for current SBCL
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimB9Tkq-tNahndR+C45e7PhmHn8CfDD3mBQAu=G@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <iti9id$rs2$1@dough.gmane.org>

> This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections
> to the patch?

It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list anymore.

So, well, maybe I should take over maintainership after all?




From radisb at gmail.com  Sat Jun 18 20:50:09 2011
From: radisb at gmail.com (Vassilis Radis)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:50:09 +0300
Subject: [elephant-devel] Fwd: Elephant patch for current SBCL
In-Reply-To: <iti9id$rs2$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTimB9Tkq-tNahndR+C45e7PhmHn8CfDD3mBQAu=G@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<iti9id$rs2$1@dough.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikh6WMpFv9E2UV292gbwC7364SyRw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi at gmail.com>wrote:

> This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections
>> to the patch?
>>
>
> It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list anymore.
>
> So, well, maybe I should take over maintainership after all?
>
> I think there are many people who cannot push patches but (would like to)
depend on elephant (including me), so someone has to take over.
Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches then
no one will answer your question, because you are the only one qualified to
answer it :)

>
> ______________________________**_________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/**mailman/listinfo/elephant-**devel<http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/elephant-devel/attachments/20110618/96c4ecd8/attachment.html>

From eslick at media.mit.edu  Sun Jun 19 01:23:48 2011
From: eslick at media.mit.edu (Ian Eslick)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:23:48 -0700
Subject: [elephant-devel] Fwd: Elephant patch for current SBCL
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikh6WMpFv9E2UV292gbwC7364SyRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimB9Tkq-tNahndR+C45e7PhmHn8CfDD3mBQAu=G@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<iti9id$rs2$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<BANLkTikh6WMpFv9E2UV292gbwC7364SyRw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A57F8FFD-D533-4C75-A40F-FB0E4C484D3D@media.mit.edu>

I missed the earlier patch from Red somehow.  I do follow the Elephant list and am more than happy to grow the crew of people who can do patching.  Alex, I'll ask to get you perms for Elephant on cl.net.  Anyone else interested in pushing to Elephant directly?  The more the merrier.

Thanks,
Ian

On Jun 18, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Vassilis Radis wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi at gmail.com> wrote:
> This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections
> to the patch?
> 
> It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list anymore.
> 
> So, well, maybe I should take over maintainership after all?
> 
> I think there are many people who cannot push patches but (would like to) depend on elephant (including me), so someone has to take over. 
> Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches then no one will answer your question, because you are the only one qualified to answer it :) 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/elephant-devel/attachments/20110618/4e845ec8/attachment.html>

From alex.mizrahi at gmail.com  Mon Jun 20 09:50:27 2011
From: alex.mizrahi at gmail.com (Alex Mizrahi)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:50:27 +0300
Subject: [elephant-devel] Fwd: Elephant patch for current SBCL
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikh6WMpFv9E2UV292gbwC7364SyRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimB9Tkq-tNahndR+C45e7PhmHn8CfDD3mBQAu=G@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>	<iti9id$rs2$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<BANLkTikh6WMpFv9E2UV292gbwC7364SyRw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <itn554$j8n$1@dough.gmane.org>

> Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches
> then no one will answer your question, because you are the only one
> qualified to answer it :)

Not all questions require qualifications...
It looks like we have enough people here who can participate in 
discussions, it is just that they're not willing to take responsibility 
of doing a code review and actually pushing a patch. I'm not a big fan 
of it either :)

BTW it looks like I've fixed with class updates, derived and inherited 
indices. I didn't change a lot, but from my own experience change is 
dramatic: it just wasn't working before and it works now. I'm going to 
test it a bit more, though.

db-postmodern also got a cheap pset implementation so set-valued slots 
can be used now.

Ian> Alex, I'll ask to get you perms for Elephant on cl.net.

Cool, thanks.




From radisb at gmail.com  Mon Jun 20 10:02:03 2011
From: radisb at gmail.com (Vassilis Radis)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:02:03 +0300
Subject: [elephant-devel] Fwd: Elephant patch for current SBCL
In-Reply-To: <itn554$j8n$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTimB9Tkq-tNahndR+C45e7PhmHn8CfDD3mBQAu=G@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik2HdVoEcp=tAAOtY-60zzJz6tL6XSpASc9OJAT@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim6Xm1NOs-RG2ZiPmo90kFb8ZGH-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<iti9id$rs2$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<BANLkTikh6WMpFv9E2UV292gbwC7364SyRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<itn554$j8n$1@dough.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=7B+P-sRgATmvweMYi1=fx4y7XtA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi at gmail.com>wrote:

> Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches
>> then no one will answer your question, because you are the only one
>> qualified to answer it :)
>>
>
> Not all questions require qualifications...
> It looks like we have enough people here who can participate in
> discussions, it is just that they're not willing to take responsibility of
> doing a code review and actually pushing a patch. I'm not a big fan of it
> either :)
>
> My mistake then. In your comment:
  "It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list
anymore",
I just translated "can" to "is technically able to" , not "is willing to".


> BTW it looks like I've fixed with class updates, derived and inherited
> indices. I didn't change a lot, but from my own experience change is
> dramatic: it just wasn't working before and it works now. I'm going to test
> it a bit more, though.
>
> db-postmodern also got a cheap pset implementation so set-valued slots can
> be used now.
>
> Ian> Alex, I'll ask to get you perms for Elephant on cl.net.
>
> Cool, thanks.
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/**mailman/listinfo/elephant-**devel<http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/elephant-devel/attachments/20110620/f8b8353f/attachment.html>