From gugamilare at gmail.com Wed Sep 2 01:05:18 2009 From: gugamilare at gmail.com (Gustavo) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:05:18 -0300 Subject: [cl-store-devel] [cltl3-devel] RFC: CLtL3 Charter In-Reply-To: <4be8713d0909011804q562c0a88v4fd594acb012ad44@mail.gmail.com> References: <0016e648fca6bc77dc04728a295a@google.com> <4be8713d0909011753k412c1990r543925766852fcb3@mail.gmail.com> <4be8713d0909011804q562c0a88v4fd594acb012ad44@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4be8713d0909011805gbe05c24n4fed1139139ebe5@mail.gmail.com> Sorry, just a mistake. 2009/9/1 Gustavo > > > 2009/9/1 > >> >> I'd personally much prefer a 'lispy' (read : verbose and understandable) >> implementation of regexps then the one from perl, and still wouldn't want it >> included as part of CLtL3.. >> > > cl-ppcre allow the use of sexps as regexps. I think that they are "verbose" > and "understandable". > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gugamilare at gmail.com Wed Sep 2 01:04:02 2009 From: gugamilare at gmail.com (Gustavo) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:04:02 -0300 Subject: [cl-store-devel] Fwd: [cltl3-devel] RFC: CLtL3 Charter In-Reply-To: <4be8713d0909011753k412c1990r543925766852fcb3@mail.gmail.com> References: <0016e648fca6bc77dc04728a295a@google.com> <4be8713d0909011753k412c1990r543925766852fcb3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4be8713d0909011804q562c0a88v4fd594acb012ad44@mail.gmail.com> 2009/9/1 > > I'd personally much prefer a 'lispy' (read : verbose and understandable) > implementation of regexps then the one from perl, and still wouldn't want it > included as part of CLtL3.. > cl-ppcre allow the use of sexps as regexps. I think that they are "verbose" and "understandable". -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: