From seb-cl-mailist at matchix.com  Tue Sep 11 17:02:40 2007
From: seb-cl-mailist at matchix.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Saint-Sevin?=)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:02:40 +0200
Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] documentation in 1.3.1
Message-ID: <46E6CA30.8070408@matchix.com>

Hi Edi,

The documentation is wrong since the patch included in 1.3.1.

- It should mention that regex-replace-all returns a second value "matchp" as regex-replace does.
- The examples needs to be updated to reflect the introduction of this second value.
- The changelog should also mentioned that regex-replace-all was updated.

Cheers,
Sebastien

PS: one day, I will learn how to submit nice diff patch... on my windows machine :-)



From edi at agharta.de  Thu Sep 13 07:54:59 2007
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:54:59 +0200
Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] New release 1.3.2   (Was: documentation in 1.3.1)
In-Reply-To: <46E6CA30.8070408@matchix.com> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28S=E9bastien?=
	Saint-Sevin's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:02:40 +0200")
References: <46E6CA30.8070408@matchix.com>
Message-ID: <umyvr80fg.fsf@agharta.de>

> The documentation is wrong since the patch included in 1.3.1.
>
> - It should mention that regex-replace-all returns a second value
>   "matchp" as regex-replace does.
> - The examples needs to be updated to reflect the introduction of
>   this second value.
> - The changelog should also mentioned that regex-replace-all was
>   updated.

Thanks, I totally missed that.  Should be fixed now.

Edi.