what does 'deprecated' mean with respect to "bare structure types"?

Tue Jun 11 13:03:47 UTC 2013

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:44 AM, james anderson <james.anderson at setf.de> wrote:
> Still, the API argument stands.
>
> which is? (a link to the pertinent point in the thread suffices.)

Given a clean start, the API wouldn't have a type that mixes value and
reference semantics arbitrarily depending on the context since it's
confusing. Deprecation is a reasonable path to cleanliness.

Cheers,

--
Luís Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/