[cffi-devel] Re: implicit defbitfield symbol values

[Stephen Compall]

On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 14:01 +0100, Luís Oliveira wrote:
> > I was thinking, though, should the starting point be 0 or 1?  I don't
> > know which more people would expect, and selected 0 because that's what
> > the defbitfield doc in the manual seemed to imply.
> 
> Hmm. Now that you mention it, 1 probably makes more sense.

http://scompall.nocandysw.com/cffi/dbf-value-is-1.darcs.patch

I just love it when there's a good place to use PROG1.

-- 
Stephen Compall
http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cffi-devel/attachments/20060512/5b299dbc/attachment.sig>