From frank_goenninger at t-online.de Sat Feb 28 19:36:59 2004 From: frank_goenninger at t-online.de (Frank Goenninger) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:36:59 +0100 Subject: [cello-devel] Hello, anybody there already? Message-ID: <1077997019.18814.1.camel@stargate.de.goenninger.com> Hi all on the list: I've not yet seen any traffic so far here. Now, I'm wondering the move from cells-devel to cello-devel worked... Regards, Frank -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ktilton at nyc.rr.com Sat Feb 28 20:01:37 2004 From: ktilton at nyc.rr.com (Kenny Tilton) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:01:37 -0500 Subject: [cello-devel] Hello, anybody there already? In-Reply-To: <1077997019.18814.1.camel@stargate.de.goenninger.com> References: <1077997019.18814.1.camel@stargate.de.goenninger.com> Message-ID: <4040F3A1.2070105@nyc.rr.com> I'm here, back on the re-factoring job after some time on Lisp + music. Going well, just got cl-magick working again. I now have separate, standalone sub-systems: cl-opengl cl-ftgl cl-magick (still a little cleaning here) cello-glut (widgets, but no magick and only glut fonts) cello-ftgl (cello-glut + cl-ftgl) cello-magick (not sure if I want to bother with this one) ...and then: cello (the whole shooting match) And as admin I do see folks signing up including the porters. Just gotta get this clean-up done. I lost a bit of time on cl-ftgl when I could not work out why I had to re-init the dll on each run. (Or at least it seemed that way.) Not that that is the end of the world, but it did not seem right so I killed almost a day on that. In fact I am now seeing something similar with cl-magick: images work once, then not again. Mind you, I have this caching scheme for both fonts and wands so I think I have just botched things or don't understand dlls that well and have introduced some nasty interactions. I am kinda punting once I get anything working with whatever kludges, leaving better solution to another day. I do like the refactoring and I think things should be heating up now that you have scored an X11 port, so it was a good time for this. I gotta take a break now and get some exercise and I have a social engagement this evening, but I should be back on the job later tonight and might get out Portacello 2.0 before retiring. cheers, kenny Frank Goenninger wrote: >Hi all on the list: > >I've not yet seen any traffic so far here. Now, I'm wondering the move >from cells-devel to cello-devel worked... > >Regards, > Frank > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >cello-devel site list >cello-devel at common-lisp.net >http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cello-devel > -- http://tilton-technology.com Why Lisp? http://alu.cliki.net/RtL%20Highlight%20Film Your Project Here! http://alu.cliki.net/Industry%20Application