From dto1138 at gmail.com Fri Jul 8 05:20:00 2011 From: dto1138 at gmail.com (David O'Toole) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 01:20:00 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] boston lisp meetings? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: (My apologies if this is a duplicate posting.) Are people still doing the Boston Lisp Meetings? I've been very busy since my January 2009 presentation :) http://lispgamesdev.blogspot.com/2011/06/blockyio-preview-video.html http://lispgamesdev.blogspot.com/2011/06/voronoia.html From dto1138 at gmail.com Fri Jul 8 05:17:44 2011 From: dto1138 at gmail.com (David O'Toole) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 01:17:44 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] boston lisp meetings? Message-ID: Are people still doing the Boston Lisp Meetings? I've been very busy since my January 2009 presentation :) http://lispgamesdev.blogspot.com/2011/06/blockyio-preview-video.html http://lispgamesdev.blogspot.com/2011/06/voronoia.html From dherring at tentpost.com Fri Jul 8 14:18:12 2011 From: dherring at tentpost.com (dherring at tentpost.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:18:12 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] boston lisp meetings? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <849418a314061b33f471d79116ce9633.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> David O'Toole wrote: > Are people still doing the Boston Lisp Meetings? Unfortunately not. Having taken a year off, maybe we have energy to start up again? > I've been very busy since my January 2009 presentation :) > > http://lispgamesdev.blogspot.com/2011/06/blockyio-preview-video.html > > http://lispgamesdev.blogspot.com/2011/06/voronoia.html David, would you like to kick off the first meeting of a new series? Do others have things they want to present at this meeting or following ones? Traditional meeting dates: July 25, August 29, September 26 Any preferences for the kickoff? Any volunteers for room arrangements? Thanks, Daniel From dto1138 at gmail.com Sat Jul 9 04:38:54 2011 From: dto1138 at gmail.com (David O'Toole) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:38:54 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] boston lisp meetings? In-Reply-To: <849418a314061b33f471d79116ce9633.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> References: <849418a314061b33f471d79116ce9633.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> Message-ID: Hi Daniel, (am I speaking to one Daniel or two?) Sure, I'd love to do a presentation. I have more than enough material, plus I will ask if the lisp games crowd want to have another game design contest in the interim, so that I could present some results from the community as well. I think I could put together a better demo if I had until the August 29 date to prepare it. It would also be great if I could practice the presentation in front of a few people sometime before the real gig. I don't have much experience with giving presentations (other than the last one in 2009) so a bit of feedback beforehand could be very helpful in making the "live" presentation more effective. While these pages are a little out of date, I have some more information about my libraries and various other projects at http://ioforms.org Does anyone have format suggestions or questions that I can use to make the presentation more helpful or more relevant? On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:18 AM, wrote: > David, would you like to kick off the first meeting of a new series? > > Do others have things they want to present at this meeting or following ones? > > Traditional meeting dates: July 25, August 29, September 26 > Any preferences for the kickoff? ?Any volunteers for room arrangements? From danking at ccs.neu.edu Sat Jul 9 14:10:05 2011 From: danking at ccs.neu.edu (Daniel King) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 10:10:05 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] boston lisp meetings? In-Reply-To: <849418a314061b33f471d79116ce9633.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> References: <849418a314061b33f471d79116ce9633.squirrel@webmail.tentpost.com> Message-ID: > David, would you like to kick off the first meeting of a new series? > > Do others have things they want to present at this meeting or following ones? > > Traditional meeting dates: July 25, August 29, September 26 > Any preferences for the kickoff? ?Any volunteers for room arrangements? I'm part of a small group of undergrads at Northeastern who are working on improvements/updates to SCSH. We'd be interested in giving a presentation. The August 29 date would also give us more time to organize a proper presentation. Next Monday, I will look into the availability of rooms here on NU's campus for the meeting. -- Dan King College of Computer and Information Science Northeastern University From dto1138 at gmail.com Tue Jul 19 21:27:50 2011 From: dto1138 at gmail.com (David O'Toole) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:27:50 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] preparing for "Lisp Games and Visual Programming" Message-ID: Hello everyone, Thanks for the opportunity to do another presentation. I've been very busy since January 09 and will have a lot to show (including hands-on demos with joysticks and possibly some dance pad stuff.) I've picked up an HD camcorder and will be bringing my friend Dana once again to help out with video recording and with the demos. He's also been working with Scheme in his graduate studies so that will be fun. I will need a projector or something (VGA or HDMI) for the visuals, but I will bring my own speakers. Last I heard there wasn't a venue yet for the meeting, so I thought I should mention it now. As I will be bringing quite a few pieces of equipment to Boston for this, and have a lot of material, I would prefer the same full-hour format as my 09 presentation. I have several topics to cover: 1. Some games I've released in Common Lisp in the last 2 years. Here's a video retrospective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr3piK3T6a8 2. What the larger Lisp Games community has been doing in terms of various libraries, games, and projects. 3. My current work with Lisp visual programming and discussion of future directions. As I mentioned before, I'd love to give a dry run of my presentation to a few people sometime before the real event, to practice and collect feedback. What do you think? From dto1138 at gmail.com Fri Jul 22 19:10:35 2011 From: dto1138 at gmail.com (David O'Toole) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:10:35 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] Fwd: restatement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David O'Toole Date: Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM Subject: Re: restatement To: John Morrison Okay John, "Our goal for MAK was to commercialize the technology and make it available to game makers and video arcades." ?-- taken from this article by your MAK co-founder: http://www.entrepreneurship.org/en/resource-center/using-sbir-to-bootstrap-your-company.aspx Thanks for the lunch offer, but I'm not going to have an off-the-record discussion of any kind with you, I'm not going to look at or discuss code you've been working on that possibly violates a non-compete agreement still in force, and I'm not going to discuss my own future plans with someone who might open source "server side stuff" that involves his patent on networked physics simulations: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5623642 http://www.google.com/patents?id=soEoAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=john%20morrison%20simulation&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=john%20morrison%20simulation&f=false Was this patent research funded by public money? "The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of contract no. DAAH01-91-C-R269 awarded by the Small Business Innovation Research agency (SBIR). This contract in no way limits the rights of non-government entities to request and receive licenses under the invention." >From the Katz article: "From an entrepreneur's standpoint, what's most remarkable about the SBIR program is that it essentially provides free venture capital from the federal government. Under the program, the government offers up to $850,000 in seed capital, requires no money back, takes no equity in the company, and retains few intellectual property rights to technologies developed with the funds." I don't think we have anything to discuss. On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:20 PM, John Morrison wrote: > The non-compete does not "cover" any software, including anyd unreleased > software I have written.? It precludes me from competing with that company > before that date.? Competing means either selling or open sourcing software > into the niche market served by that company.? I used the term "releasing " > to mean either selling or open sourcing. > > As to what I want to talk about, I was actually interested in what YOU want > to do with respect to Lisp and games.? A hobby?? A livelihood? An altruistic > activity to popularize Lisp?? Something else?? I hoped a discussion would > help both clarify my own thinking and perhaps identify some opportunities > for complementary endeavors.? But no sweat if it's not your idea of a good > time. > > -jm > > -- John Morrison > > On Jul 21, 2011 9:47 PM, "David O'Toole" wrote: >> I could probably sum all this up by saying: >> >> 1. I don't want to discuss your unreleased work if you can't release >> it until the agreement expires, because that fairly obviously signals >> that it's covered by the agreement. >> >> 2. I really might give better answers if you told me in more detail >> what you want to talk about. > --------------- Hi John, before discussing things further I would want to be sure that our conversation would not in itself cause a legal problem for me in the future. i maintain a "clean room" for my projects, and left the software industry partly in order to be completely free and clear from any form of non-compete agreement, intellectual property/invention assignment agreements, and non-disclosure, as my ethical precepts disallow them. more to the point, I would need unambiguous assurance that the unreleased code you just mentioned, and any ideas we discuss (whether or not involved in the code, and whether or not i even see the code) will NOT be affected in any way by the agreement still in force between yourself and Mak. - Show quoted text - ----------- Hello David, Sorry to be brief. ?Am on family vacation & using itsy-bitsy phone to reply hopefully only to you. ?Am working on hopefully industrial strength lisp based simulation/game. ?Am located in MA. ?Would love to have a chat about what you're doing & what your goals are. ?Am under non-compete with simulation company I co-founded & sold (mak.com) - agreement is up 21 Dec this year. ?Have code in the can - mostly server stuff - but cannot release anything yet. ?Please reply if interested in chatting - I'll buy. -jm -- John Morrison - Show quoted text - > _______________________________________________ > boston-lisp mailing list > boston-lisp at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/boston-lisp From dto1138 at gmail.com Fri Jul 22 20:19:22 2011 From: dto1138 at gmail.com (David O'Toole) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:19:22 -0400 Subject: [boston-lisp] a bit of context Message-ID: I felt obligated to disclose this email train because other programmers (possibly those on this list whom he may contact privately) should know that: 1. whatever he open-sources (before or after dec 21) may be subject to non-compete issues and patents; 2. Asking pointed questions about both non-compete and patents did not produce satisfying or complete answers, in that: 3. He appears to have danced around the non-compete issue, mentioning the agreement and its expiration date in the first email but then trying to explain why it wasn't going to be relevant to our discussion; 4. I had to find out about the patent from Google, even though it seems pretty reasonable to wonder whether a networked method for calculating newtonian physics interactions in a simulated virtual world could apply to server code for an online game, AND even though I had specifically mentioned patents as a general concern. If anything, my privately negative reaction to the non-compete agreement issue might have kept others from hearing about it later, which could be a problem, since the non-compete issue is what led me to the patent. If Mr. Morrison has violated any agreements in talking to me, that's not my problem.