From slawek.zak at gmail.com  Wed Oct 26 13:04:35 2011
From: slawek.zak at gmail.com (Slawek Zak)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:04:35 +0200
Subject: [anaphora-devel] aand issue
In-Reply-To: <CADow0CpgF5RfNsCQeFBksxjot7stmAFZWg9=sYPNLOheG=OPOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEYSiYzQEj4ZWkcNkv8P6WJ_E4ByNjwqGeA3YN5ou1yE0u1EMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADow0CpgF5RfNsCQeFBksxjot7stmAFZWg9=sYPNLOheG=OPOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEYSiYx39fomMTsJAezh4dXa=tvhEgTdujnDjspCJFgmzDsVBw@mail.gmail.com>

Indeed it might be useful like it is now. Thanks for remembering :)

/S

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nikodemus Siivola <
nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:

> On 10 September 2011 13:03, Slawek Zak <slawek.zak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > PG's aand is recursive and the one in anaphors isn't - is there a reason
> for
> > that?
> >
> > PG> (aand 1 2 it)
> > 2
> > ANAPHORA> (aand 1 2 it)
> > 1
>
> To support idioms like
>
>  (aand (gethash x table)
>        (integerp it)
>        it) ; the integer, not the boolean
>
> . One size doesn't fit all.
>
> Cheers,
>
>  -- Nikodemus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/anaphora-devel/attachments/20111026/92f236d7/attachment.html>