[hunchentoot-devel] mod_lisp anyone?

[Cyrus Harmon]

If I understand what you're saying, the openAIR stuff currently works  
on hunchentoot and there is a desire to see it ported to aserve. Just  
curious, but what is the motivation for wanting to use aserve? Is it a  
performance issue? installed base? etc...

thanks,

Cyrus

On Apr 9, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Andy Chambers wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Hans Hübner <hans at huebner.org> wrote:
>>
>> Are there any features that you are really looking for?
>
> How hard would it be to make sessions work independently of
> hunchentoot?  I'd like (or rather Kenny would like) to make my openAIR
> stuff work with aserve.  Aserve does have webactions but it seems to
> involve more than just sessions.  They have a concept of "managed
> pages" which doesn't really fit with the way I've done things so far.
>
> I made a half-hearted attempt at just copying sessions.lisp and
> specials.lisp into my own project but it seemed like if I was actually
> going to make it work, I'd end up with all the same dependencies as
> hunch anyway so what would be the point.
>
> I also remember thinking it might be nice to have some of the request
> accessors be methods instead of functions.  Would that be expensive in
> terms of performance?  It would mean I could code my project to
> hunch's interface and add defmethods to handle aserve requests
> differently.
>
> --
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel