[parenscript-devel] A COND clause with unspecified consequent produces a syntax error

[Vladimir Sedach]

Fixed. Thanks for the bug report.

2010/6/1 Daniel Gackle <danielgackle at gmail.com>:
> (ps (setf x (cond ((foo) 123)
>                   ((bar))
>                   (t 456))))
> => "x = foo() ? 123 : (bar() ? () : 456);"
> Similarly,
> (ps (defun blah ()
>                 (cond ((foo) 123)
>                       ((bar))
>                       (t 456))))
> =>
> "function blah() {
>     if (foo()) {
>         return 123;
>     } else if (return bar()) {
>     } else {
>         return 456;
>     };
> };"
> No doubt the (bar) form should produce NIL instead, as in CL.
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>