[erlisp-devel] Erlisp and uptick

Faré fahree at gmail.com
Sun Jul 24 15:19:51 UTC 2005


Relevant discussion on the uptick blog:
http://wagerlabs.com/uptick/2005/07/very-frustrating-saturday.html
The author has rival concerns about speed and memory-efficiency of threads.

My take:

The idea is that there should be a standard API, and then multiple
ways of implementing it. Providing a light-weight implementation in
terms of green threads (Eric Lavigne just ported erlisp to cmucl), or
of a continuation passing transform (Screamer style), are definitely
implementation strategies for Erlisp.
And if all goes well, we can mix and match implementation strategies
within a same Erlisp universe: gimme slower memory-efficient threads
for this, faster memory-wasting threads for that, migratable
(Tube-like) threads for that other thing, etc.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Proprietary software is dead software. Using it is a form of necrophilia.
                -- Faré



More information about the Erlisp-devel mailing list